next up previous
Next: Results and Conclusion Up: Value at Risk in Previous: Review

Analysis of the returns

We construct the probability distribution $ p(x)$ for the normalized returns using the relative frequency definition. We study all the sensex scrips and two scrips not in sensex but in the rolling settlement. We take the adjusted daily prices and compute the returns as indicated earlier. The data used is for the period 1 January 1998 till 31 December 2000 for sensex scrips and 1 April 1999 till 31 December 2000 for those in the rolling settlement.

For each scrip we take the normalized returns (the difference in closing prices of today and yesterday normalized by yesterday's price) and compute the relative frequency distribution as follows.

The normalized returns are put in bins of length 0.002 (so that the interval [-1,1] is broken up in to equal subintervals of length 0.002 (there will be 1000 of them). We note here that strictly speaking we should not restrict ourselves only to the interval [-1,1], however, in practice the normalized returns never exceeded the value 1 in modulus, so this is fine.

To each of these subintervals $ I_j$ we assign the value

$\displaystyle P(I_j) = \frac{\text{Number of times the normalized return falls in} I_j}{\text{Total number of observations}}
$

Then the probability density function $ p(x)$ is defined as

$\displaystyle p(x) = P(I_j), ~~$   if$\displaystyle ~~ x \in I_j.
$

This is the relative frequency definition of the probability density for the returns.

Using this distribution $ p(x)$ for each scrip we compute the VaR for each of them, namely $ VaR_{99\%}$ is computed as the largest number $ X$ such that

$\displaystyle \sum_{i \leq j : X \in I_j} P(I_i) \leq 0.01.
$

In words it is the number $ X$ such that the total probability of the returns falling in the interval (-$ \infty$, X] is 0.01 (which is (1 - 99/100)).

We have done this construction as a first approximation to study the qualitative behaviour of the returns distribution, to further model it and study it. However the result was so surprising that this procedure is sufficient to observe the significant qualitative feature of the returns.


next up previous
Next: Results and Conclusion Up: Value at Risk in Previous: Review
Krishna Maddaly 2001-06-29