Next: About this document ...
Up: Value at Risk in
Previous: Results and Conclusion
Table 1: Some scrips in the rolling settlement
| Scrip Name/VaR |
 |
 |
 |
| PentaSoft |
0.102 |
0.082 |
0.072 |
| Visual Soft |
0.084 |
0.082 |
0.052 |
Table 2: Sensex Scrips
| Scrip Name/VaR |
 |
 |
 |
| ACC |
0.082 |
0.06 |
0.46 |
| BSES |
0.082 |
0.054 |
0.038 |
| Bajaj Auto |
0.074 |
0.042 |
0.03 |
| BHEL |
0.082 |
0.68 |
0.048 |
| Castrol |
0.064 |
0.034 |
0.026 |
| Cipla |
0.082 |
0.05 |
0.038 |
| Colgate |
0.07 |
0.04 |
0.032 |
| Dr Reddy's Lab |
0.082 |
0.06 |
0.038 |
| Glaxo |
0.08 |
0.048 |
0.034 |
| Grasim |
0.06 |
0.062 |
0.046 |
| Guj Ambuja Cem |
0.082 |
0.05 |
0.04 |
| Hindalco |
0.08 |
0.046 |
0.034 |
| Hindustan Lever |
0.064 |
0.04 |
0.028 |
| Hindustan Petro |
0.082 |
0.062 |
0.048 |
| ICICI |
0.082 |
0.064 |
0.046 |
| ITC |
0.082 |
0.046 |
0.034 |
| Infosys |
0.082 |
0.064 |
0.042 |
| Larsen and Toubro |
0.082 |
0.056 |
0.042 |
| MTNL |
0.082 |
0.058 |
0.048 |
| Mahindra &Mahindra |
0.082 |
0.068 |
0.048 |
| NIIT |
0.082 |
0.068 |
0.05 |
| Nestle |
0.07 |
0.038 |
0.03 |
| Ranbaxy |
0.082 |
0.048 |
0.038 |
| Reliance |
0.078 |
0.044 |
0.036 |
| Reliance-petrol |
0.064 |
0.044 |
0.032 |
| Satyam Computers |
0.104 |
0.082 |
0.06 |
| SBI |
0.082 |
0.052 |
0.038 |
| Tisco |
0.082 |
0.066 |
0.048 |
| Telco |
0.082 |
0.052 |
0.04 |
| Zee |
0.102 |
0.082 |
0.066 |
Note: To be technically correct all the numbers in
the above two tables
should carry a negative sign in front, but we prefer to use the
loose meaning that value at risk is value
that could be lost, therefore present the numbers without signs.
References
1
Jean-Philippe Bouchaud
Power-laws in economy and finance: some ideas from physics
http://xxx.imsc.res.in/e-print/cond-mat/00008103
2
Hendrics, D (1996)
Evaluation of Value at Risk models using Historical Data
Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Reiew, April, pp39-69
3
G Barone-Adesi and K Giannopoulos
Non Parametric VaR techniques : Myths and Realities
Preprint, November 2000
4
Mandira Sarma, Susan Thomas and Ajay Shah
Performance evaluation of alternative VaR models
Working paper, IGIDR, March 2000
5
J R Varma
Report of the committee on risk containment for futures markets
Committee report, SEBI
Next: About this document ...
Up: Value at Risk in
Previous: Results and Conclusion
Krishna Maddaly
2001-06-29